T-Rank: Fun with Advanced Player Stats 2019 : Nana Akenten

Yr	Cls	Ht	Player	Team	Conf.	G	Min%	PRPG!	ORtg	Usg	eFG	TS	OR	DR	Ast	TO	Blk	Stl	FTR	FT		2P		3P
2019	So	6-6	Nana Akenten	Nebraska	B10	27	23.9	0.8	100.4	18.4	46.1	46.1	6.5	14.8	4.1	6.7	0.9	1.6	14.0	7-16	.438	18-39	.462	23-75	.307
Conf. games:						Conf. games:		17	23.4	0.2	86.7	17.6	35.0	36.0	7.2	13.6	3.2	3.6	0.6	1.6	18.3	5-11	.455	12-25	.480	6-35	.171
Top 100 quality games:						Top 100:		22	21.7	0.1	84.4	17.5	33.8	34.6	7.8	15.1	3.0	5.5	1.3	1.9	13.8	5-11	.455	15-33	.455	8-47	.170
Top 50 quality games:						Top 50:		16	22.6	0.4	91.0	18.8	38.1	37.9	7.8	14.5	4.8	3.8	0.6	1.1	15.3	3-9	.333	12-23	.522	7-36	.194

2018	Fr	6-6	Nana Akenten	Nebraska	B10	7	1.6	-0.0	84.7	21.1	33.3	35.2	5.3	5.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	22.2	1-2	.500	0-1	.000	2-8	.250
Conf. games:						Conf. games:		2	1.0	-0.4	57.8	13.6	0.0	25.6	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	200.0	1-2	.500	0-0	.000	0-1	.000
Top 100 quality games:						Top 100:		3	1.1	-0.4	39.7	17.4	0.0	16.9	0.0	13.8	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	100.0	1-2	.500	0-0	.000	0-2	.000
Top 50 quality games:						Top 50:		2	1.7	-0.4	57.0	13.9	0.0	25.6	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	200.0	1-2	.500	0-0	.000	0-1	.000

Total:																				8-18	.444	18-40	.450	25-83	.301

2019 Play-by-play stats

DUNKS		At the rim			Other 2-PT			3-Pt Jumpers
Tot	Pct.	Tot	Pct.	Ast'ed	Tot	Pct.	Ast'ed	Tot	Pct.	Ast'ed
4-5	80.0%	14-25	56.0%	42.9%	4-14	28.6%	50.0%	23-75	30.7%	95.7%

Nana Akenten 2019 Advanced Stats Game Log
Date		Opponent	Result	Mins	ORtg	Usage	eFG	TS%	OR%	DR%	AST%	TO%	Stl%	Blk%	Dunk	Rim	Mid	2Pt	3Pt	FT	Ast	TO	Stl	Blk	OR	DR	PF	Pts
11-6		Mississippi Valley St.	W, 106–37	13	107.4	42.3	61	58	0	21	0	9	0	0	0-0	1-2	0-1	1-3	5-11	1-3	0	1	0	0	0	4	1	18
11-11		Southeastern Louisiana	W, 87–35	15	204.6	9.4	113	113	0	6	12	0	4	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0	3-4	0-0	1	0	1	0	0	1	1	9
11-14		Seton Hall	W, 80–57	11	79.0	10.6	33	33	0	18	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	1-2	1-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	2
11-19		Missouri St.	W, 85–62	18	171.7	12.9	92	92	0	6	10	0	0	0	0-0	1-1	0-0	1-1	3-5	0-0	1	0	0	0	0	1	2	11
11-20		Texas Tech	L, 70–52	10	54.8	19.8	25	25	0	24	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	1-1	1-1	0-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	2	3	2
11-24		Western Illinois	W, 73–49	16	111.1	21.7	42	43	14	11	10	0	0	0	0-1	1-2	0-0	1-2	1-4	1-2	1	0	0	0	2	2	0	6
11-26		Clemson	W, 68–66	13	134.5	22.5	50	50	21	0	16	0	0	0	0-0	1-2	0-0	1-2	1-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	2	0	0	5
12-2	•	Illinois	W, 75–60	13	132.4	16.3	33	51	23	16	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-1	1-1	1-2	0-1	2-2	0	0	0	0	2	2	1	4
12-5	•	Minnesota	L, 85–78	11	105.6	8.4	150	150	0	12	0	65	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0	1-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	0	1	3	3
12-8		Creighton	W, 94–75	15	83.0	19.4	30	30	18	14	0	21	12	8	0-0	0-1	0-1	0-2	1-3	0-0	0	1	3	1	2	2	3	3
Date		Opponent	Result	Mins	ORtg	Usage	eFG	TS%	OR%	DR%	AST%	TO%	Stl%	Blk%	Dunk	Rim	Mid	2Pt	3Pt	FT	Ast	TO	Stl	Blk	OR	DR	PF	Pts
12-16		Oklahoma St.	W, 79–56	16	21.4	12.9	0	0	9	29	0	28	0	6	0-0	0-1	0-0	0-1	0-2	0-0	0	1	0	1	1	4	2	0
12-22		Cal St. Fullerton	W, 86–62	21	103.3	10.5	113	113	0	17	0	47	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0	3-4	0-0	0	2	0	0	0	4	1	9
1-2	•	Maryland	L, 74–72	9	0.0	10.3	0	0	0	13	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-1	0-0	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0
1-6	•	Iowa	L, 93–84	21	103.8	15.3	42	47	0	28	7	0	3	0	0-0	1-2	0-0	1-2	1-4	2-3	1	0	1	0	0	5	3	7
1-10	•	Penn St.	W, 70–64	7	0.0	7.3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
1-14	•	Indiana	W, 66–51	16	26.3	8.6	0	0	0	13	9	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	0	2	2	0
1-17	•	Michigan St.	L, 70–64	10	97.6	19.9	50	45	8	0	0	0	0	0	2-2	2-2	0-0	2-2	0-2	0-1	0	0	0	0	1	0	2	4
1-21	•	Rutgers	L, 76–69	11	71.5	11.9	33	33	0	9	0	0	10	0	0-0	1-1	0-1	1-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	2	0	0	1	2	2
1-26	•	Ohio St.	L, 70–60	15	0.0	12.7	0	0	0	7	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-1	0-0	0-1	0-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0
1-29	•	Wisconsin	L, 62–51	8	11.3	20.5	0	0	11	14	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-3	0-3	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	1	1	2	0
Date		Opponent	Result	Mins	ORtg	Usage	eFG	TS%	OR%	DR%	AST%	TO%	Stl%	Blk%	Dunk	Rim	Mid	2Pt	3Pt	FT	Ast	TO	Stl	Blk	OR	DR	PF	Pts
2-2	•	Illinois	L, 71–64	6	48.0	13.6	0	0	14	0	27	0	10	0	0-0	0-1	0-0	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	0
2-6	•	Maryland	L, 60–45	12	84.8	17.3	38	38	6	23	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-1	0-1	1-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	1	3	2	3
2-9	•	Purdue	L, 81–62	8	97.2	41.2	42	42	29	54	0	0	0	15	0-0	1-2	0-1	1-3	1-3	0-0	0	0	0	1	2	3	0	5
2-13	•	Minnesota	W, 62–61	Did not Play
2-16	•	Northwestern	W, 59–50	Did not Play
2-19	•	Penn St.	L, 95–71	6	78.6	30.5	50	50	0	0	0	33	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0	1-3	0-0	0	1	0	0	0	0	1	3
2-23	•	Purdue	L, 75–72	13	97.7	17.9	50	45	8	15	0	0	0	0	0-0	2-2	0-0	2-2	0-2	0-1	0	0	0	0	1	2	3	4
2-28	•	Michigan	L, 82–53	10	147.5	28.0	79	79	18	0	0	0	6	0	2-2	3-3	1-2	4-5	1-2	0-0	0	0	1	0	2	0	4	11
3-5	•	Michigan St.	L, 91–76	12	47.2	20.7	0	10	16	11	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-3	1-4	0	0	0	0	2	1	1	1
3-10	•	Iowa	W, 93–91	Did not Play
3-13		Rutgers	W, 68–61	Did not Play
3-14		Maryland	W, 69–61	Did not Play
3-15		Wisconsin	L, 66–62	Did not Play
3-20		Butler	W, 80–76	Did not Play
3-24		TCU	L, 88–72	Did not Play
																					0.3	0.3	0.3	0.1	2.4			4.1

Nana Akenten 2019 Statistical Trends

Show trend for:

Career stats for Nana Akenten

RecruiT-Rank (0-100): 62.8

2019 Play-by-play stats

Nana Akenten 2019 Advanced Stats Game Log

Nana Akenten 2019 Statistical Trends

Nana Akenten 2019 Offensive Skill Curve