Click Here or Go Landscape for Full Site Layout

#194 - Austin Peay (19-15)

Matt FiggerOhio Valley Conference (12-6)

Tourney ResultsTeamcastTeam History

Similar ResumésSimilar Efficiency Profiles


Trend Stat:

Start game No.: | End game No:


Team Stats

Vs: | Venue:
Category Offense Defense Barthag
Adj. Eff. 103.4 184 106.7 214 .4201 194
eFG% 49.9 208 54.0 296
TO% 19.8 273 22.1 12
OR% 34.7 17 28.9 186
FTR 35.9 100 39.9 299
Shooting Stats
3P% 34.8 173 37.1 283
2P% 49.0 204 53.0 283
FT% 66.1 325 72.5 244
Stylistic Stats
3P Rate 29.7 323 37.2 171
Ast. Rate 48.6 264 48.5 76
Adj. Tempo 70.2119

Fun Stuff

Category Offense Defense Barthag
Qual. Eff. 94 250 111.8 282 .1441 278
Last 10 Eff. 106.2 157 110.6 264 .3968 211
Close Games 7-4 (.636) 59
Qual. Games 0-2 (.000) 203
(Expected) Strength of Schedule
Non-con Overall
Elite L% 22 % 54 14 % 171
Basic 0.4963 107 0.426 203
Current 0.4963 107 0.426 203
Committee Resumé Metrics
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Pre-Tourney 0-2 0-6 3-6 13-0

Austin Peay Schedule & Results

Date Opponent T-Rank Line Result Rec. G-score +/-
Tournament Quality Tests in bold
Fri 11-10 A 290 79 (II) Vanderbilt Vanderbilt -22.4, 89-66 (95%) L, 73-54 0-1 15 -8.5
Mon 11-13 A 287 3 (I) Virginia Virginia -24.9, 77-52 (98%) L, 93-49 0-2 5 -27.2
Wed 11-15 H 301 0 (IV)Oakland City Austin Peay (100%) W, 109-50 1-2 - -
Sun 11-19 H 298 196 (III) UNC Asheville UNC Asheville -5.9, 78-72 (69%) L, 82-79 OT 1-3 27 -1.2
Wed 11-22 N 296 0 (IV)Bethel (TN) Austin Peay (100%) W, 90-58 2-3 - -
Sun 11-26 H 294 193 (III) Miami OH Austin Peay -3.3, 72-69 (62%) W, 86-61 3-3 95 19.3
Wed 11-29 A 269 48 (II) Oklahoma St. Oklahoma St. -22.3, 87-65 (95%) L, 79-63 3-4 40 -12.4
Sat 12-02 H 263 351 (IV) Alabama A&M Austin Peay -15.8, 81-66 (90%) W, 67-47 4-4 52 12.9
Wed 12-06 A 250 87 (III) Illinois Illinois -17.2, 83-66 (91%) L, 64-57 4-5 52 0.3
Sat 12-16 A 241 149 (III) Evansville Evansville -9.8, 70-60 (83%) L, 78-74 OT 4-6 49 -2.4
Tue 12-19 H 233 178 (IV) Troy Austin Peay -0.0, 73-72 (50%) W, 75-73 5-6 48 -3.8
Fri 12-22 H 221 54 (II) Western Kentucky Western Kentucky -9.2, 78-68 (78%) L, 72-53 5-7 13 -5.4
Thu 12-28 H 226 311 (IV) SIU Edwardsville Austin Peay -11.1, 78-67 (83%) W, 78-58 6-7 (1-0) 78 11.6
Sat 12-30 H 212 255 (IV) Eastern Illinois Austin Peay -6.6, 69-62 (74%) W, 70-54 7-7 (2-0) 81 4.5
Thu 01-04 H 194 295 (IV) Tennessee Martin Austin Peay -9.2, 71-62 (81%) W, 75-69 8-7 (3-0) 32 7.7
Sat 01-06 H 186 257 (IV) Southeast Missouri St. Austin Peay -9.3, 78-68 (79%) W, 76-71 9-7 (4-0) 37 3.2
Thu 01-11 A 185 224 (III) Tennessee Tech Tennessee Tech -1.8, 72-70 (56%) L, 86-74 9-8 (4-1) 13 -4.5
Sat 01-13 A 190 152 (III) Jacksonville St. Jacksonville St. -7.3, 70-62 (76%) W, 87-67 10-8 (5-1) 96 16.6
Thu 01-18 A 176 204 (III) Tennessee St. Austin Peay -1.0, 63-62 (54%) L, 70-56 10-9 (5-2) 8 -3.5
Sat 01-20 A 188 92 (II) Belmont Belmont -10.4, 74-64 (82%) L, 83-59 10-10 (5-3) 9 -8.8
Thu 01-25 H 195 284 (IV) Eastern Kentucky Austin Peay -10.2, 74-63 (82%) W, 90-84 11-10 (6-3) 32 5.2
Sat 01-27 H 198 279 (IV) Morehead St. Austin Peay -7.5, 73-65 (75%) W, 92-76 12-10 (7-3) 63 13.7
Thu 02-01 A 193 295 (IV) Tennessee Martin Austin Peay -2.4, 71-68 (59%) W, 59-57 13-10 (8-3) 34 7.4
Sat 02-03 A 194 257 (IV) Southeast Missouri St. Austin Peay -0.3, 77-76 (51%) W, 96-81 14-10 (9-3) 75 6.5
Thu 02-08 A 188 75 (I) Murray St. Murray St. -13.6, 79-66 (87%) L, 84-63 14-11 (9-4) 18 -9.7
Sat 02-10 A 192 255 (IV) Eastern Illinois Austin Peay -1.4, 67-66 (55%) W, 76-69 15-11 (10-4) 59 6.6
Thu 02-15 H 191 224 (III) Tennessee Tech Austin Peay -7.4, 75-68 (74%) L, 86-80 15-12 (10-5) 16 -5
Sat 02-17 H 200 152 (III) Jacksonville St. Austin Peay -1.4, 68-67 (55%) W, 60-57 16-12 (11-5) 60 6
Thu 02-22 A 197 311 (IV) SIU Edwardsville Austin Peay -3.7, 76-73 (63%) W, 86-82 17-12 (12-5) 33 -2
Sat 02-24 H 198 75 (II) Murray St. Murray St. -6.1, 76-70 (70%) L, 73-64 17-13 (12-6) 38 1.3
Ohio Valley Conference Tournament
Thu 03-01 N 198 255 (IV) Eastern Illinois Austin Peay -3.8, 70-66 (64%) W, 73-66 18-13 53 -4.1
Fri 03-02 N 199 92 (II) Belmont Belmont -9.5, 79-69 (79%) L, 94-79 18-14 29 -11.7
Postseason Tournament
Thu 03-15 H 195 230 (IV) Louisiana Monroe Austin Peay -5.5, 72-66 (69%) W, 80-66 19-14 74 11.4
Wed 03-21 H 193 180 (IV) Illinois Chicago Austin Peay -3.9, 77-73 (63%) L, 83-81 19-15 34 4.9

Austin Peay Player Stats

Player Gms Min% PRPG! ORtg Usage eFG% TS% OR% DR% Ast% TO% Blk% Stl% FC/40 FTR FTM-FTA FT% 2PM-2PA 2P% 3PM-3PA 3P%
Terry Taylor
#21, 6-5, Fr
32 78.9 3.9 121.1 22.1 59.2 62.0 13.4 18.8 4.4 14.5 3.8 1.0 3.2 37.6 97-131 .740 149-260 .573 38-88 .432
Averyl Ugba
#24, 6-7, Sr
32 76.7 3 110.5 24.4 55.9 58.5 10.6 21.1 7.5 17.3 3.9 0.9 3.6 47.3 109-164 .665 170-303 .561 16-44 .364
Zach Glotta
#25, 5-11, Jr
32 54.7 1.9 115.8 18.0 50.0 53.7 1.9 7.9 19.6 13.1 0.0 2.2 3.5 24.7 43-53 .811 28-63 .444 53-152 .349
Dayton Gumm
#4, 6-2, Fr
31 62.9 1 97.4 21.4 47.4 49.4 3.4 10.2 12.5 18.2 0.0 2.2 2.9 31.5 51-86 .593 71-160 .444 39-113 .345
Chris Porter-Bunton
#3, 6-5, Jr
32 61.1 0.9 100.0 19.1 49.3 52.8 5.1 16.6 14.6 22.9 0.5 2.8 5.8 38.5 54-79 .684 62-133 .466 26-72 .361
Steve Harris
#23, 6-4, Jr
32 50.7 0.2 91.5 19.9 47.4 50.3 3.9 6.9 8.0 23.4 1.7 1.9 3.7 30.1 39-58 .672 81-172 .471 7-21 .333
Richard Henderson
#22, 6-6, Fr
30 23.0 0 92.8 17.6 50.7 49.9 8.2 18.7 1.9 19.7 4.5 1.0 5.7 42.7 14-32 .438 38-75 .507 0-0 .000
Tre' Ivory
#1, 5-10, Sr
32 64.8 -1.4 79.1 15.1 28.1 32.0 2.1 7.6 24.1 25.5 0.0 2.2 3.7 35.5 29-55 .527 33-116 .284 7-39 .179
Benchwarmers (fewer than 10% minutes played)
Ed Stephens
#11, 6-2, Sr
9 6.8 -0 93.4 14.6 43.8 46.1 1.3 7.4 6.1 17.9 0.0 0.7 2.7 8.3 2-2 .999 3-8 .375 5-16 .313
Ferran Bernacer
#10, 6-5, Fr
5 1.2 -0.8 27.3 13.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.1 19.3 53.9 0.0 7.2 7.5 0.0 0-0 .000 0-0 .000 0-2 .000
Ivan Cucak
#15, 7-0, Fr
20 8.8 -0.8 56.3 11.2 55.0 52.5 1.0 5.7 4.3 53.9 1.1 1.0 7.7 50.0 2-5 .400 4-9 .444 1-1 .999
Deyshawn Martin
#2, 6-6, Jr
5 3.7 -1.1 62.1 14.7 25.0 32.0 2.3 21.6 6.9 32.5 5.0 1.2 5.8 20.0 2-2 .999 1-3 .333 1-7 .143
Acoydan McCarthy
#0, 6-6, Fr
21 7.0 -0.6 56.3 11.4 30.8 32.5 0.0 7.2 5.5 33.4 1.3 0.6 3.1 38.5 2-5 .400 4-13 .308 0-0 .000

Compiled by Bart Torvik from sacred data and secret formulas.