Click Here or Go Landscape for Full Site Layout

Career stats for Pat Ackerman

RecruiT-Rank (0-100): 11.6

Yr Cls Ht Player Team Conf. Role G Min% PRPG! BPM OBPM DBPM ORtg Usg eFG TS OR DR Ast TO Blk Stl FTR FC/40 FT 2P 3P
2015Jr6-10Patrick AckermanUDMHorzC2922.5-0.3-3.5-4.91.490.88.546.347.
Conf. games:Conf. games:1414.0-0.2-2.5-4.31.795.47.940.040.82.614.
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:1221.4-0.9-7.8-7.7-0.162.910.
Top 50 quality games:Top 50:431.9-1.2-4.8-5.60.865.79.637.537.
2013So6-11Pat AckermanPSUB10C134.6-0.1-10.0-9.8-
Conf. games:Conf. games:116.1-0.2-10.2-
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:125.9-0.0-9.3-
Top 50 quality games:Top 50:85.20.1-7.6-8.91.387.213.650.
2012Fr6-11Pat AckermanPSUB10C122.1-0.7-15.7-14.9-
Conf. games:Conf. games:41.1-0.6-10.9-
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:72.0-0.7-9.0-8.3-
Top 50 quality games:Top 50:61.8-0.6-12.4-11.2-

2012 Play-by-play stats

DUNKS At the rim Other 2-PT 3-Pt Jumpers
Tot Pct. Tot Pct. Ast'ed Tot Pct. Ast'ed Tot Pct. Ast'ed
0-00% 0-10.0%0% 0-20.0%0% 0-00.0%0%

Pat Ackerman 2012 Advanced Stats Game Log

11-12 HartfordW, 70–5520.027.500000100000-00-00-00-00-00-00100000-33.2-26.3-7.0-1.20
11-14 RadfordW, 62–4620.00.0000000000-00-00-00-00-00-00000000-5.0-4.0-1.0-0.10
11-16 LIU BrooklynW, 77–68Did not Play
11-19 v. KentuckyL, 85–4710.00.0000000000-00-00-00-00-00-00000000-6.7-5.5-1.2-0.20
11-20 v. South FloridaW, 53–49Did not Play
11-23 Youngstown St.W, 82–71Did not Play
11-26 @ Saint Joseph'sL, 65–4720.020.0000000000-00-10-00-10-00-00000000-18.7-13.0-5.8-0.70
11-30 @ Boston CollegeW, 62–5440.025.000094061000-00-00-10-10-00-00100032-31.3-34.22.9-2.10
12-4 MississippiL, 72–70Did not Play
12-7 LafayetteL, 61–57Did not Play
12-10 @ DuquesneL, 66–5940.00.0000000000-00-00-00-00-00-00000000+0.2-0.20.4-0.00
12-18 Mount St. Mary'sW, 72–4330.022.3000430100000-00-00-00-00-00-00100011-28.4-29.31.0-1.30
12-21 CornellW, 74–67Did not Play
12-29β€’ @ MichiganL, 71–53Did not Play
1-1β€’ @ NorthwesternL, 68–56Did not Play
1-5β€’ PurdueW, 65–4510.00.0000000000-00-00-00-00-00-00000000-2.2-3.51.3-0.10
1-8β€’ IndianaL, 88–82Did not Play
1-11β€’ @ NebraskaL, 70–58Did not Play
1-15β€’ MinnesotaL, 80–66Did not Play
1-19β€’ IllinoisW, 54–52Did not Play
1-22β€’ @ IndianaL, 73–54Did not Play
1-25β€’ @ Ohio St.L, 78–5450.08.30002700000-00-00-10-10-00-00000012-15.6-16.71.1-1.60
1-31β€’ WisconsinL, 52–46Did not Play
2-4β€’ @ IowaL, 77–64Did not Play
2-8β€’ @ Michigan St.L, 77–57Did not Play
2-11β€’ NebraskaW, 67–5110.00.0000000000-00-00-00-00-00-00000000-1.6-0.5-1.1-0.00
2-16β€’ IowaW, 69–64Did not Play
2-19β€’ @ WisconsinL, 65–55Did not Play
2-25β€’ NorthwesternL, 67–66Did not Play
2-29β€’ @ PurdueL, 80–5610.00.0000000000-00-00-00-00-00-00000000-5.2-1.5-3.8-0.10
3-4β€’ MichiganL, 71–65Did not Play
3-8β€Ί v. IndianaL, 75–5810.00.0000000000-00-00-00-00-00-00000000-6.6-3.2-3.4-0.10

Pat Ackerman 2012 Offensive Skill Curve