Click Here or Go Landscape for Full Site Layout

Career stats for Rip Economou

RecruiT-Rank (0-100): 27.8

Yr Cls Ht Player Team Conf. Role G Min% PRPG! BPM OBPM DBPM ORtg Usg eFG TS OR DR Ast TO Blk Stl FTR FC/40 FT 2P 3P
2022Jr6-8Rip EconomouSeaWACStretch 41110.30.4-1.5-0.6-0.9111.514.560.359.
Conf. games:Conf. games:24.0-0.7-10.0-4.9-
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:
2021Jr6-8Rip EconomouSeaWACWing F1724.8-0.5-5.5-
Conf. games:Conf. games:819.70.1-1.6-4.12.4100.311.944.
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:127.5-0.8-10.1-
Top 50 quality games:Top 50:127.5-0.8-10.1-
2020So6-8Rip EconomouSeaWACPF/C185.70.0-6.1-4.4-1.791.119.942.548.
Conf. games:Conf. games:84.30.4-0.71.8-2.5126.220.861.
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:48.3-0.1-10.9-6.7-4.281.415.
Top 50 quality games:Top 50:27.5-1.3-26.6-18.7-
2019Fr6-8Rip EconomouSeaWACPF/C134.3-0.0-10.8-7.3-3.485.721.238.640.
Conf. games:Conf. games:84.9-0.2-12.5-9.6-2.871.419.627.332.
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:46.7-0.5-10.7-4.5-6.151.315.820.
Top 50 quality games:Top 50:10.6-0.2-1.5-

2019 Play-by-play stats

DUNKS At the rim Other 2-PT 3-Pt Jumpers
Tot Pct. Tot Pct. Ast'ed Tot Pct. Ast'ed Tot Pct. Ast'ed
0-00% 1-1100.0%100.0% 0-10.0%0% 5-2025.0%100.0%

Rip Economou 2019 Advanced Stats Game Log

11-6 @ StanfordL, 96–745110.216.550500000000-01-10-01-10-10-00000000-2.41.4-3.9-0.22
11-11 v. BryantW, 82–5930.00.0000000000-00-00-00-00-00-00000001-11.5-11.70.2-0.60
11-14 v. Washington St.W, 78–69Did not Play
11-18 Southern UtahL, 73–70Did not Play
11-23 DenverW, 82–6330.014.4000000000-00-00-00-00-10-00000001-29.4-23.2-6.2-1.50
11-24 FairfieldW, 83–80Did not Play
11-25 LongwoodW, 70–5020.021.00004900000-00-00-00-00-10-00000010-25.2-21.4-3.8-0.80
12-1 Eastern WashingtonW, 88–68Did not Play
12-6 Nebraska OmahaW, 90–71Did not Play
12-9 @ WashingtonL, 70–62Did not Play
12-17 @ PortlandW, 67–56Did not Play
12-20 Prairie View A&MW, 102–649120.035.26464170017000-00-00-10-13-60-00100102+0.56.5-6.0+0.09
12-29 @ CaliforniaW, 82–73Did not Play
1-3β€’ @ Cal St. BakersfieldL, 83–713210.517.201050000000-00-00-00-00-02-20000004-16.0-22.76.7-0.82
1-5β€’ @ Grand CanyonL, 71–57428.627.00026000000-00-00-00-00-20-00000100-15.0-5.6-9.4-1.10
1-12β€’ @ Utah ValleyL, 88–78Did not Play
1-17β€’ New Mexico St.L, 87–6070.010.1000000000-00-00-00-00-10-10000000-14.7-7.9-6.8-1.90
1-19β€’ UT Rio Grande ValleyL, 67–62Did not Play
1-24β€’ @ Chicago St.W, 75–47Did not Play
1-26β€’ @ UMKCL, 63–54Did not Play
2-2β€’ Cal BaptistL, 75–64Did not Play
2-14β€’ @ UT Rio Grande ValleyL, 59–4440.00.0000000000-00-00-00-00-00-00000000-2.9-2.7-0.1-0.10
2-16β€’ @ New Mexico St.L, 59–5310.00.0000000000-00-00-00-00-00-00000000-1.5-2.10.6-0.00
2-21β€’ UMKCW, 69–64Did not Play
2-23β€’ Chicago St.W, 77–5740.025.4000000000-00-00-00-00-30-00000002-51.3-39.8-11.5-3.20
2-26β€’ Utah ValleyL, 77–68998.022.97575000270110-00-00-00-02-40-00101002+
2-28β€’ @ Cal BaptistW, 67–6510.039.1000000000-00-00-00-00-10-00000001-72.1-57.6-14.5-1.20
3-7β€’ Cal St. BakersfieldW, 63–57Did not Play
3-9β€’ Grand CanyonW, 83–76Did not Play
3-14β€Ί v. Grand CanyonL, 84–75Did not Play
3-20β€£ PresbyterianL, 73–68Did not Play

Rip Economou 2019 Offensive Skill Curve