Click Here or Go Landscape for Full Site Layout

Career stats for Mike Smith

RecruiT-Rank (0-100): 0.0

Yr Cls Ht Player Team Conf. Role G Min% PRPG! BPM OBPM DBPM ORtg Usg eFG TS OR DR Ast TO Blk Stl FTR FC/40 FT 2P 3P
2021Sr5-11Mike SmithMichiganB10N/A68.73.8109.
2020Sr5-11Mike SmithColumbiaIvyScoring PG2994.
Conf. games:Conf. games:1496.
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:791.
Top 50 quality games:Top 50:
2019Jr5-11Mike SmithColumbiaIvyPure PG722.
2018So5-11Mike SmithColumbiaIvyScoring PG2686.33.5-0.22.8-3.0106.828.
Conf. games:Conf. games:1483.43.5-2.41.5-3.9108.
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:493.
Top 50 quality games:Top 50:286.32.0-1.70.3-2.078.540.234.939.11.78.535.
2017Fr5-11Mike SmithColumbiaIvyScoring PG2679.72.1-1.00.7-1.8102.723.746.
Conf. games:Conf. games:1484.41.8-2.5-0.1-2.396.825.740.345.21.86.521.711.90.01.826.71.843-54.79647-142.33123-60.383
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:581.
Top 50 quality games:Top 50:374.

2020 Play-by-play stats

DUNKS At the rim Other 2-PT 3-Pt Jumpers
Tot Pct. Tot Pct. Ast'ed Tot Pct. Ast'ed Tot Pct. Ast'ed
0-00% 100-18952.9%9.0% 85-20441.7%8.2% 60-17733.9%45.0%

Mike Smith 2020 Advanced Stats Game Log

11-5 Appalachian St.W, 79–71Did not Play
11-12 CreightonW, 79–69Did not Play
11-15 ElonW, 70–50Did not Play
11-22 Houston BaptistW, 111–68Did not Play
11-27 v. Iowa St.W, 83–76Did not Play
11-28 v. North CarolinaW, 73–64Did not Play
11-29 v. GonzagaW, 82–64Did not Play
12-3 @ LouisvilleL, 58–43Did not Play
12-6β€’ IowaW, 103–91Did not Play
12-11β€’ @ IllinoisL, 71–62Did not Play
12-14 OregonL, 71–70Did not Play
12-21 PresbyterianW, 86–44Did not Play
12-29 UMass LowellW, 86–60Did not Play
1-5β€’ @ Michigan St.L, 87–69Did not Play
1-9β€’ PurdueW, 84–78Did not Play
1-12β€’ @ MinnesotaL, 75–67Did not Play
1-17β€’ @ IowaL, 90–83Did not Play
1-22β€’ Penn St.L, 72–63Did not Play
1-25β€’ IllinoisL, 64–62Did not Play
1-28β€’ @ NebraskaW, 79–68Did not Play
2-1β€’ v. RutgersW, 69–63Did not Play
2-4β€’ Ohio St.L, 61–58Did not Play
2-8β€’ Michigan St.W, 77–68Did not Play
2-12β€’ @ NorthwesternW, 79–54Did not Play
2-16β€’ IndianaW, 89–65Did not Play
2-19β€’ @ RutgersW, 60–52Did not Play
2-22β€’ @ PurdueW, 71–63Did not Play
2-27β€’ WisconsinL, 81–74Did not Play
3-1β€’ @ Ohio St.L, 77–63Did not Play
3-5β€’ NebraskaW, 82–58Did not Play
3-8β€’ @ MarylandL, 83–70Did not Play