Click Here or Go Landscape for Full Site Layout

Career stats for Louis Tang

RecruiT-Rank (0-100): 0.0

Yr Cls Ht Player Team Conf. Role G Min% PRPG! BPM OBPM DBPM ORtg Usg eFG TS OR DR Ast TO Blk Stl FTR FC/40 FT 2P 3P
2020Fr6-4Louis TangVMISCWing G3030.20.1-5.4-3.4-2.089.819.845.847.86.214.48.620.00.31.924.14.816-26.61530-57.52613-51.255
Conf. games:Conf. games:1828.0-0.1-6.6-3.9-2.781.522.440.842.86.913.99.621.50.01.727.74.310-18.55616-35.4577-30.233
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:632.70.0-4.0-3.9-0.185.217.440.042.54.523.911.517.50.01.525.04.53-5.6008-12.6670-8.000

2020 Play-by-play stats

DUNKS At the rim Other 2-PT 3-Pt Jumpers
Tot Pct. Tot Pct. Ast'ed Tot Pct. Ast'ed Tot Pct. Ast'ed
0-00% 24-4652.2%45.8% 6-1154.5%16.7% 13-5125.5%92.3%

Louis Tang 2020 Advanced Stats Game Log

DateOpponentResultMinsORtgUsageeFGTS%OR%DR%AST%TO%Stl%Blk%DunkRimMid2Pt3PtFTAstTOStlBlkORDRPFBPMOPMDPMNETPts
11-5 @ East CarolinaL, 80–682186.127.045459111120300-03-70-03-71-30-01210222-4.5-1.0-3.6-1.29
11-8 MaristL, 58–561358.029.125400240331400-01-20-01-20-22-20230032-1.8-10.78.9+0.14
11-11 PresbyterianL, 80–7726130.014.3505808160200-02-31-13-40-22-22010021-2.8-1.6-1.2-0.18
11-14 @ Arkansas St.L, 71–5613113.715.98383913030000-01-10-01-11-20-00100113-3.6-1.2-2.5-0.45
11-15 v. IdahoL, 68–671272.26.315015000076000-00-00-00-01-10-00100001-7.5-3.0-4.5-1.13
11-17 v. UC DavisW, 89–8411240.71.1000121700110-00-00-00-00-00-01001013-6.4-8.92.4-0.90
11-24β€’ @ UNC GreensboroL, 74–631533.614.600917120400-00-20-00-20-20-01010120-7.8-4.6-3.2-1.90
12-4 @ DuquesneL, 71–581775.018.540400211421000-02-20-02-20-30-01100034-13.5-11.7-1.7-3.64
12-7 StetsonW, 88–6115187.814.7929210000000-00-01-11-13-50-00000104+7.29.5-2.3+1.911
12-21 @ Virginia TechL, 64–551350.610.10010211547000-00-00-00-00-10-01100131-6.9-5.8-1.2-1.40
DateOpponentResultMinsORtgUsageeFGTS%OR%DR%AST%TO%Stl%Blk%DunkRimMid2Pt3PtFTAstTOStlBlkORDRPFBPMOPMDPMNETPts
12-29 @ USC UpstateL, 91–827138.121.310069191600000-01-10-01-10-02-40000110+0.06.2-6.2+0.34
1-1β€’ FurmanL, 89–7319129.421.55865603414300-01-21-12-31-32-23110102+5.86.1-0.3+2.09
1-4β€’ SamfordL, 78–751261.519.8505090047500-00-00-00-01-30-00210102-10.5-8.2-2.3-1.83
1-8β€’ Western CarolinaL, 97–8530.022.4000000000-00-00-10-10-10-00000000-33.4-19.5-13.9-1.90
1-11β€’ @ East Tennessee St.L, 61–55984.036.440461511019700-01-31-12-40-11-10110110+4.93.41.6+0.75
1-15β€’ @ MercerL, 73–621159.520.8252200170600-01-30-11-40-00-11010000-5.7-5.1-0.6-0.82
1-18β€’ The CitadelW, 88–7940.07.70002600000-00-00-10-10-00-00000010-17.6-11.6-5.9-1.20
1-22β€’ @ WoffordL, 66–542157.017.83341013031000-01-10-01-10-22-40200022-11.3-9.1-2.2-3.84
1-25β€’ MercerL, 69–6670.020.9000000000-00-10-00-10-30-00000000-32.3-19.1-13.2-3.60
1-29β€’ @ FurmanL, 74–7212117.722.1100770301922000-02-20-02-20-02-41100033+3.7-0.74.4+0.76
DateOpponentResultMinsORtgUsageeFGTS%OR%DR%AST%TO%Stl%Blk%DunkRimMid2Pt3PtFTAstTOStlBlkORDRPFBPMOPMDPMNETPts
2-5β€’ WoffordL, 79–732472.927.064649131650000-02-41-13-51-20-02600234-11.5-6.5-4.9-4.69
2-8β€’ @ The CitadelW, 75–64978.243.73029302500000-00-20-00-21-31-40000221-16.0-5.4-10.6-2.14
2-12β€’ @ ChattanoogaL, 86–671483.629.363638313343400-01-20-11-31-10-02310131+0.1-0.80.9+0.25
2-15β€’ East Tennessee St.L, 72–671376.013.902582100000-00-10-00-10-22-20000124-14.7-10.3-4.4-3.22
2-19β€’ @ Western CarolinaW, 74–717118.825.9100100180032000-00-00-10-12-20-00100102+9.711.4-1.7+1.36
2-22β€’ UNC GreensboroL, 71–68433.526.10024000000-00-00-00-00-20-00000100-24.0-9.6-14.4-1.60
2-26β€’ ChattanoogaL, 71–6417134.215.3676763000000-04-40-04-40-20-00000150+6.75.71.0+2.38
2-29β€’ @ SamfordL, 84–7820.020.80004000000-00-00-00-00-10-00000011-37.2-30.4-6.9-1.40
3-6β€Ί v. SamfordW, 96–78453.934.400490001300-00-20-00-20-10-00010200-19.0-10.3-8.7-1.30
3-7β€Ί v. East Tennessee St.L, 70–5714135.89.0676704600000-01-11-12-20-10-00000051+1.8-0.52.3+0.44
DateOpponentResultMinsORtgUsageeFGTS%OR%DR%AST%TO%Stl%Blk%DunkRimMid2Pt3PtFTAstTOStlBlkORDRPFBPMOPMDPMNETPts
0.50.80.40.02.23.8

Louis Tang 2020 Offensive Skill Curve