Click Here or Go Landscape for Full Site Layout

Career stats for Fatts Russell

RecruiT-Rank (0-100): 60.6

Yr Cls Ht Player Team Conf. Role G Min% PRPG! BPM OBPM DBPM ORtg Usg eFG TS OR DR Ast TO Blk Stl FTR FC/40 FT 2P 3P
2022Sr5-11Fatts RussellUMDB10N/A77.23.0101.123.01.511.021.417.00.82.3
2021Sr5-11Fatts RussellRIA10Scoring PG2374.
Conf. games:Conf. games:1571.
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:1273.71.7-0.3-0.90.689.425.732.842.31.514.822.
Top 50 quality games:Top 50:480.61.8-1.1-
2020Jr5-10Fatts RussellRIA10Pure PG3088.
Conf. games:Conf. games:1888.
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:1488.
Top 50 quality games:Top 50:890.
2019So5-10Fatts RussellRIA10Scoring PG3281.71.7-0.8-1.10.392.926.438.344.01.87.422.415.
Conf. games:Conf. games:1780.12.30.1-
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:973.6-1.1-5.4-5.0-0.368.625.030.533.
Top 50 quality games:Top 50:480.60.9-3.1-3.0-0.177.727.539.443.23.510.713.726.
2018Fr5-10Daron RussellRIA10Combo G3444.51.10.7-0.41.1101.121.743.646.92.98.315.511.80.22.618.04.634-42.81043-102.42239-131.298
Conf. games:Conf. games:1845.70.1-2.4-3.00.687.520.735.
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:1244.
Top 50 quality games:Top 50:743.

2021 Play-by-play stats

DUNKS At the rim Other 2-PT 3-Pt Jumpers
Tot Pct. Tot Pct. Ast'ed Tot Pct. Ast'ed Tot Pct. Ast'ed
0-10.0% 56-11150.5%14.3% 14-6621.2%0.0% 24-10223.5%45.8%

Fatts Russell 2021 Advanced Stats Game Log

11-25 Old DominionW, 85–67Did not Play
11-27 NavyW, 82–52Did not Play
11-29 Mount St. Mary'sW, 79–61Did not Play
12-4 Saint Peter'sW, 90–57Did not Play
12-9 @ ClemsonL, 67–51Did not Play
12-14β€’ RutgersL, 74–60Did not Play
12-22 La SalleW, 84–71Did not Play
12-25β€’ @ PurdueL, 73–70Did not Play
12-28β€’ @ WisconsinW, 70–64Did not Play
12-31β€’ MichiganL, 84–73Did not Play
1-4β€’ @ IndianaL, 63–55Did not Play
1-7β€’ IowaL, 89–67Did not Play
1-10β€’ @ IllinoisW, 66–63Did not Play
1-19β€’ @ MichiganL, 87–63Did not Play
1-23β€’ @ MinnesotaW, 63–49Did not Play
1-27β€’ WisconsinL, 61–55Did not Play
2-2β€’ PurdueW, 61–60Did not Play
2-5β€’ @ Penn St.L, 55–50Did not Play
2-8β€’ Ohio St.L, 73–65Did not Play
2-14β€’ MinnesotaW, 72–59Did not Play
2-16β€’ NebraskaW, 64–50Did not Play
2-17β€’ NebraskaW, 79–71Did not Play
2-21β€’ @ RutgersW, 68–59Did not Play
2-28β€’ Michigan St.W, 73–55Did not Play
3-3β€’ @ NorthwesternL, 60–55Did not Play
3-7β€’ Penn St.L, 66–61Did not Play
3-11β€Ί v. Michigan St.W, 68–57Did not Play
3-12β€Ί v. MichiganL, 79–66Did not Play
3-20β€£ v. ConnecticutW, 63–54Did not Play
3-22β€£ v. AlabamaL, 96–77Did not Play