Click Here or Go Landscape for Full Site Layout

Team:
Conf: State:
By Conf By Coach
Start: End:
vs. Top: or
Venue: | Type:
Min. Games:
Show:

2022 Customizable T-Rank and Tempo-Free Stats


D-I Avg:

102.3

0.4952
Eff. FG%
50
Turnover%
18.4
Rebound%
28.1
FT Rate
30.3
2-Pt %
49.7
3-Pt %
33.6

67.1
Rk Team Conf G Rec AdjOE AdjDE Barthag EFG% EFGD% TOR TORD ORB DRB FTR FTRD 2P% 2P%D 3P% 3P%D Adj T. WAB
142 Seattle WAC 30 23-9
14–4
98.7
248
96.3
63
.5711
142
48.3
256
46.4
33
16.3
47
20.5
53
26
249
25.6
68
28.8
227
40.5
343
47.1
275
46
34
33.1
205
31.4
61
70.4
32
-3.6
102
314 UT Rio Grande Valley WAC 29 8-23
3–15
98.5
251
112.6
342
.1767
314
49.5
200
51.9
259
20.7
313
17.9
204
24.7
288
33.5
344
41.4
2
35.7
301
51.9
88
53.7
320
30.3
317
32.7
122
71.7
14
-16.3
321
Rk Team Conf G Rec AdjOE AdjDE Barthag Efg% EfgD% TOR TORD ORB DRB FTR FTRD 2P% 2P%D 3P% 3P%D Adj T. WAB

Play-by-Play splits

Dunks Close Twos Farther Twos Threes
Dunks Close Twos Far Twos Threes
Offense Defense Offense Defense Offense Defense Offense Defense
O% D% O% D% O% D% O% D%
FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share
1 Seattle WAC69.62.381813.956.629.557.457.435.135.924.732.132.128.133.145.831.331.336.8
2 UT Rio Grande Valley WAC90.86.584.884.86.158.540.260.260.236402244442430.337.732.732.739.9

Trends

(If these fail to load, try refreshing)

;

Compiled by Bart Torvik from sacred data and secret formulas.
Quadrant filter based on NCAA thresholds and estimated Selection Sunday NET rank