Click Here or Go Landscape for Full Site Layout

Team:
Conf: State:
By Conf By Coach
Start: End:
vs. Top: or
Venue: | Type:
Min. Games:
Show:

2011 Customizable T-Rank and Tempo-Free Stats


D-I Avg:

101.8

0.4947
Eff. FG%
49.1
Turnover%
20
Rebound%
32.2
FT Rate
37.7
2-Pt %
47.8
3-Pt %
34.4

66.7
Rk Team Conf G Rec AdjOE AdjDE Barthag EFG% EFGD% TOR TORD ORB DRB FTR FTRD 2P% 2P%D 3P% 3P%D Adj T. WAB
3 Duke
   1 seed, Sweet Sixteen
ACC 37 32-5
13–3
119.5
5
89.9
8
.9634
3
53.7
17
44.5
11
17.2
29
21
100
35.1
79
33.2
214
37.4
183
29.6
32
52.5
16
43.1
16
37.4
45
32.4
58
69.9
38
9.5
3
25 Michigan
   8 seed, R32
B10 34 20-14
9–9
111.9
36
93.2
34
.8907
25
52.3
41
48.9
154
16.2
11
18.8
248
25.2
329
29.3
60
26.7
343
30.4
41
51.7
24
49.4
240
35.3
113
32
39
62.7
322
1.9
31
Rk Team Conf G Rec AdjOE AdjDE Barthag Efg% EfgD% TOR TORD ORB DRB FTR FTRD 2P% 2P%D 3P% 3P%D Adj T. WAB

Play-by-Play splits

Dunks Close Twos Farther Twos Threes
Dunks Close Twos Far Twos Threes
Offense Defense Offense Defense Offense Defense Offense Defense
O% D% O% D% O% D% O% D%
FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share
1 Duke 1 ACC93.58.684.984.94.470.129.456.356.33537.835.431.831.840.437.435.332.432.424.5
2 Michigan 8 B1092.75.392924.569.323.570701939.433.540.440.443.635.343323237.5

Trends

(If these fail to load, try refreshing)

;

Compiled by Bart Torvik from sacred data and secret formulas.
Quadrant filter based on NCAA thresholds and estimated Selection Sunday NET rank