Click Here or Go Landscape for Full Site Layout

Team:
Conf: State:
By Conf By Coach
Start: End:
vs. Top: or (or better)
Venue: | Type:
Min. Games:

2021 Customizable T-Rank and Tempo-Free Stats


D-I Avg:

102.2

0.4932
Eff. FG%
50.1
Turnover%
18.9
Rebound%
28
FT Rate
31.4
2-Pt %
49.8
3-Pt %
33.8

68.2
Rk Team Conf G Rec AdjOE AdjDE Barthag EFG% EFGD% TOR TORD ORB DRB FTR FTRD 2P% 2P%D 3P% 3P%D Adj T. WAB
280 Middle Tennessee CUSA 22 5-18
3–13
93.3
304
103.7
208
.2285
280
45.4
320
53
289
21.7
308
19.8
106
24.9
246
26
94
24.9
321
28.8
109
43.1
338
55.5
326
32.5
228
32
77
69.2
117
-13.6
325
303 Nebraska Omaha Sum 25 5-20
3–11
93.7
301
106.5
265
.1858
303
46.3
305
53.5
304
18.1
125
16.8
288
23.2
295
26.7
127
29.2
235
31.1
163
44.8
318
51.2
235
33.5
174
38.4
333
71.1
51
-14.3
333
Rk Team Conf G Rec AdjOE AdjDE Barthag Efg% EfgD% TOR TORD ORB DRB FTR FTRD 2P% 2P%D 3P% 3P%D Adj T. WAB

Play-by-Play splits

Dunks Close Twos Farther Twos Threes
Dunks Close Twos Far Twos Threes
Offense Defense Offense Defense Offense Defense Offense Defense
O% D% O% D% O% D% O% D%
FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share
1 Nebraska Omaha Sum93.31.493.593.54.853.137.6595939.536.235.938.338.324.233.526.638.438.436.3
2 Middle Tennessee CUSA94.72.595.595.58.15331.969.869.839.931.928.234.234.226.832.639.9323233.3

Trends

(If these fail to load, try refreshing)

;

Compiled by Bart Torvik from sacred data and secret formulas.
Quadrant filter based on NCAA thresholds and estimated Selection Sunday NET rank