Click Here or Go Landscape for Full Site Layout

Team:
Conf: State:
By Conf By Coach
Start: End:
vs. Top: or (or better)
Venue: | Type:
Min. Games:

2021 Customizable T-Rank and Tempo-Free Stats


D-I Avg:

101.8

0.492
Eff. FG%
50.2
Turnover%
19
Rebound%
27.9
FT Rate
31.6
2-Pt %
49.9
3-Pt %
33.8

68.8
Rk Team Conf G Rec AdjOE AdjDE Barthag EFG% EFGD% TOR TORD ORB DRB FTR FTRD 2P% 2P%D 3P% 3P%D Adj T. WAB
256 UT Rio Grande Valley WAC 12 9-7
2–3
93.3
302
101.4
162
.2784
256
43.3
341
46.7
35
18.1
120
24.8
4
31.1
76
35.5
341
36.8
56
45.5
339
44
329
48.6
126
28.1
342
28.4
9
71
74
-5.1
172
258 Tarleton St. WAC 13 8-10
3–7
97.8
243
106.3
259
.2751
258
48.4
246
54
314
18.3
131
22.9
18
18.8
339
32.5
319
38.6
32
47
343
45.4
313
50.6
201
36.9
47
38.5
329
65
319
-7.9
249
Rk Team Conf G Rec AdjOE AdjDE Barthag Efg% EfgD% TOR TORD ORB DRB FTR FTRD 2P% 2P%D 3P% 3P%D Adj T. WAB

Play-by-Play splits

Dunks Close Twos Farther Twos Threes
Dunks Close Twos Far Twos Threes
Offense Defense Offense Defense Offense Defense Offense Defense
O% D% O% D% O% D% O% D%
FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share
1 Tarleton St. WAC801.182.182.18.248.638.5595937.141.531.530.730.715.737.13038.538.547.2
2 UT Rio Grande Valley WAC88.93.780.680.67.954.23755.655.641.530.628.137.537.526.228.134.928.628.632.3

Trends

(If these fail to load, try refreshing)

;

Compiled by Bart Torvik from sacred data and secret formulas.
Quadrant filter based on NCAA thresholds and estimated Selection Sunday NET rank