Click Here or Go Landscape for Full Site Layout

Team:
Conf: State:
By Conf By Coach
Start: End:
vs. Top: or (or better)
Venue: | Type:
Min. Games:

2021 Customizable T-Rank and Tempo-Free Stats


D-I Avg:

101.8

0.492
Eff. FG%
50.2
Turnover%
19
Rebound%
27.9
FT Rate
31.6
2-Pt %
49.9
3-Pt %
33.8

68.8
Rk Team Conf G Rec AdjOE AdjDE Barthag EFG% EFGD% TOR TORD ORB DRB FTR FTRD 2P% 2P%D 3P% 3P%D Adj T. WAB
199 Utah Valley WAC 17 10-9
8–3
100.9
185
104.6
225
.3978
199
53
56
48.3
100
21.8
301
14.5
340
32.1
52
24.1
41
45
1
35.3
268
53.1
54
46.5
65
35
104
34.5
218
70.6
90
-6.1
198
256 UT Rio Grande Valley WAC 12 9-7
2–3
93.3
302
101.4
162
.2784
256
43.3
341
46.7
35
18.1
120
24.8
4
31.1
76
35.5
341
36.8
56
45.5
339
44
329
48.6
126
28.1
342
28.4
9
71
74
-5.1
172
Rk Team Conf G Rec AdjOE AdjDE Barthag Efg% EfgD% TOR TORD ORB DRB FTR FTRD 2P% 2P%D 3P% 3P%D Adj T. WAB

Play-by-Play splits

Dunks Close Twos Farther Twos Threes
Dunks Close Twos Far Twos Threes
Offense Defense Offense Defense Offense Defense Offense Defense
O% D% O% D% O% D% O% D%
FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share
1 Utah Valley WAC86.49.593.893.84.661.942.1575738.141.23132.532.528.43526.834.634.633.5
2 UT Rio Grande Valley WAC88.93.780.680.67.954.23755.655.641.530.628.137.537.526.228.134.928.628.632.3

Trends

(If these fail to load, try refreshing)

;

Compiled by Bart Torvik from sacred data and secret formulas.
Quadrant filter based on NCAA thresholds and estimated Selection Sunday NET rank