Click Here or Go Landscape for Full Site Layout

Team:
Conf: State:
By Conf By Coach
Start: End:
vs. Top: or (or better)
Venue: | Type:
Min. Games:

2021 Customizable T-Rank and Tempo-Free Stats


D-I Avg:

102.2

0.4932
Eff. FG%
50.1
Turnover%
18.9
Rebound%
28
FT Rate
31.4
2-Pt %
49.8
3-Pt %
33.8

68.2
Rk Team Conf G Rec AdjOE AdjDE Barthag EFG% EFGD% TOR TORD ORB DRB FTR FTRD 2P% 2P%D 3P% 3P%D Adj T. WAB
152 UTSA CUSA 22 15-11
9–7
106.1
99
104.9
234
.5324
152
49.4
194
50.9
204
15.7
23
18.1
210
26.5
207
26.9
137
23.7
332
38.3
304
49.2
190
49.8
166
33.1
199
35.1
243
71.7
34
-6.1
178
290 UT Rio Grande Valley WAC 15 9-10
2–5
90.6
336
102.0
169
.2042
290
43
344
48.1
83
19
175
24.1
6
30
103
34.1
340
37.7
33
43.5
337
44.7
321
48.5
122
26.7
345
31.6
58
70.3
81
-7.7
223
Rk Team Conf G Rec AdjOE AdjDE Barthag Efg% EfgD% TOR TORD ORB DRB FTR FTRD 2P% 2P%D 3P% 3P%D Adj T. WAB

Play-by-Play splits

Dunks Close Twos Farther Twos Threes
Dunks Close Twos Far Twos Threes
Offense Defense Offense Defense Offense Defense Offense Defense
O% D% O% D% O% D% O% D%
FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share
1 UTSA CUSA80.45.281.681.64.857.129.4636333.242.333.734.634.628.933.136.835.135.137.9
2 UT Rio Grande Valley WAC924.480.580.57.354.835.855.755.741.231.327.137.537.527.126.737.131.731.731.7

Trends

(If these fail to load, try refreshing)

;

Compiled by Bart Torvik from sacred data and secret formulas.
Quadrant filter based on NCAA thresholds and estimated Selection Sunday NET rank