Click Here or Go Landscape for Full Site Layout
D-I Avg: |
102.7 |
0.4948 |
Eff. FG% 50.4 |
Turnover% 18.6 |
Rebound% 28.7 |
FT Rate 31.4 |
2-Pt % 50 |
3-Pt % 34 |
68 |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rk | Team | Conf | G | Rec | AdjOE | AdjDE | Barthag | EFG% | EFGD% | TOR | TORD | ORB | DRB | FTR | FTRD | 2P% | 2P%D | 3P% | 3P%D | Adj T. | WAB |
19 | Virginia 4 seed, ❌ |
ACC | 18 | 15–3 9–2 |
112.2 28 |
93.1 25 |
.8953 19 |
52.7 72 |
47.9 74 |
15.3 18 |
19.6 106 |
25.6 271 |
26.4 95 |
34.4 88 |
24.8 33 |
50.8 147 |
46 39 |
37.2 40 |
33.9 177 |
62.8 359 |
3.4 13 |
35 | North Carolina St. 11 seed, ❌ |
ACC | 20 | 15–5 7–4 |
112.0 30 |
95.5 52 |
.8620 35 |
50.6 171 |
49 116 |
13.3 2 |
18.9 149 |
30.5 117 |
26.2 86 |
28.1 274 |
34.9 272 |
49.9 195 |
51.1 224 |
34.4 157 |
30.1 27 |
70.8 47 |
2 25 |
41 | Duke 5 seed, ❌ |
ACC | 20 | 14–6 7–4 |
110.4 46 |
95.1 46 |
.8477 41 |
49.7 216 |
47.5 60 |
18.2 152 |
16.9 276 |
37.1 10 |
26.2 86 |
30.7 190 |
25.7 56 |
50.3 173 |
47.9 99 |
32.4 260 |
31.1 47 |
66.3 267 |
1.3 35 |
44 | North Carolina | ACC | 19 | 13–6 7–3 |
111.0 40 |
96.1 57 |
.8393 44 |
50.5 175 |
49.9 158 |
15.9 35 |
15.8 324 |
29.5 156 |
22.3 4 |
39.5 23 |
24.2 25 |
51.5 118 |
49.4 145 |
32.5 255 |
33.9 177 |
70.2 66 |
0.8 38 |
47 | Miami FL 5 seed, ✅ |
ACC | 20 | 15–5 8–4 |
115.4 14 |
100.6 130 |
.8297 47 |
54.8 19 |
49.3 134 |
16.6 52 |
18.4 176 |
31.6 87 |
32.1 314 |
30.4 211 |
24.9 37 |
55.5 20 |
49.6 161 |
35.6 93 |
32.4 100 |
69.5 112 |
1.4 34 |
49 | Virginia Tech | ACC | 20 | 11–9 3–8 |
111.4 37 |
97.2 78 |
.8262 49 |
53.2 56 |
49.4 139 |
16.1 38 |
17.2 252 |
26.4 252 |
27.1 118 |
24.3 337 |
27.3 87 |
53.8 44 |
49.4 145 |
34.7 139 |
33 124 |
67.6 203 |
-1.8 92 |
62 | Pittsburgh 11 seed, ❌ |
ACC | 20 | 14–6 8–3 |
110.6 44 |
98.0 89 |
.8008 62 |
53.2 56 |
48.1 82 |
17 69 |
17.1 261 |
29.6 153 |
26.9 109 |
29.7 239 |
27.4 89 |
52.2 94 |
47.7 87 |
36.3 63 |
32.5 104 |
68.2 164 |
0.5 46 |
63 | Clemson | ACC | 21 | 17–4 10–2 |
107.9 81 |
95.6 53 |
.7999 63 |
53.8 37 |
46 22 |
17.2 85 |
16.6 288 |
22.7 333 |
24 25 |
34.3 95 |
32 211 |
53.3 57 |
45.5 26 |
36.3 63 |
31.2 58 |
68.7 141 |
1.6 31 |
69 | Wake Forest | ACC | 21 | 12–9 6–6 |
113.3 23 |
101.6 152 |
.7774 69 |
54.3 24 |
52.4 274 |
16.6 52 |
18.2 191 |
25.8 264 |
26.4 95 |
31.3 169 |
27.9 99 |
53.1 66 |
51.6 247 |
37.3 36 |
35.6 264 |
69.9 90 |
-1.7 89 |
120 | Syracuse | ACC | 22 | 12–10 6–6 |
106.5 105 |
102.1 167 |
.6187 120 |
52.1 98 |
49.6 144 |
17.2 85 |
19.8 101 |
30.4 122 |
34 342 |
28.6 264 |
24.7 30 |
51.4 121 |
48.3 109 |
35.7 86 |
34.1 192 |
67.8 186 |
-4 149 |
142 | Florida St. | ACC | 20 | 7–13 5–6 |
105.1 126 |
102.9 185 |
.5584 142 |
50 205 |
51.7 240 |
18.2 152 |
17.2 252 |
25.6 271 |
29.7 219 |
32.2 147 |
30.8 181 |
48.9 234 |
50.9 216 |
34.6 146 |
35.2 248 |
70.2 66 |
-6.3 223 |
150 | Notre Dame | ACC | 21 | 9–12 2–9 |
108.1 78 |
106.5 257 |
.5426 150 |
53.2 56 |
52.3 270 |
13.9 5 |
13.9 356 |
20.3 352 |
25.5 58 |
22.4 355 |
24.2 25 |
50.8 147 |
53 299 |
37.5 33 |
33.8 170 |
65 318 |
-7.2 243 |
194 | Boston College | ACC | 21 | 9–12 5–7 |
100.0 239 |
101.2 143 |
.4665 194 |
47.4 306 |
51.8 246 |
17.5 105 |
19.2 130 |
26.4 252 |
28.6 177 |
29.3 250 |
27.3 87 |
48.9 234 |
49.1 136 |
29.2 345 |
37.5 324 |
66.9 240 |
-5.2 181 |
197 | Georgia Tech | ACC | 20 | 7–13 1–10 |
99.5 246 |
100.8 135 |
.4633 197 |
46.8 318 |
49.9 158 |
17 69 |
16.3 300 |
28.7 191 |
31.4 292 |
22.5 352 |
31.1 190 |
47 296 |
51.6 247 |
31 311 |
31.1 47 |
67.7 195 |
-6.6 231 |
305 | Louisville | ACC | 20 | 2–18 0–10 |
93.9 331 |
104.7 224 |
.2220 305 |
46.7 321 |
54.3 320 |
24 360 |
17.3 246 |
26.6 248 |
30 236 |
34.4 88 |
28.1 103 |
46.1 316 |
55.8 345 |
31.9 280 |
34.7 222 |
68.5 153 |
-11.3 337 |
Rk | Team | Conf | G | Rec | AdjOE | AdjDE | Barthag | Efg% | EfgD% | TOR | TORD | ORB | DRB | FTR | FTRD | 2P% | 2P%D | 3P% | 3P%D | Adj T. | WAB |
Compiled by Bart Torvik from sacred data and secret formulas.
Quadrant filter based on NCAA thresholds and estimated Selection Sunday NET rank